duke menduar për All-on-6 dental implants, but the price is too high or the procedure too invasive?
You’re not alone.
What are the alternatives to All-on-6 dental implants?
Find out alternatives to All-on-6 dental implants, All-on-4 implants, traditional dentures, implant-supported dentures and full-arch bridges with 8 implants. Each has different benefits in stability, cost and maintenance. Prices start from €3,000 for All-on-4 implants and full-arch bridges with 8 implants from €8,000 to €15,000.
| Lloji i implantit | Cost Range (€) |
|---|---|
| Implantet All-on-4 | €3,000 – €6,000 per arch |
| Implantet All-on-6 | €8,000 – €15,000 per arch |
All-on-4 vs All-on-6: Key Differences and Benefits
Price
- All-on-4 implants are more affordable than All-on-6 implants. All-on-4 implants can cost from €3,000 to €6,000 per arch (1)
- All-on-6 implants require more implants and more material, so they are more expensive. All-on-6 can cost from €8,000 to €15,000 per arch (2)
Stability and Lifespan
- Stabiliteti: All-on-6 implants are more stable with the extra two implants that distribute the load more evenly on the jawbone.
Good for patients with significant bone loss (3) - Durability: Both All-on-4 and All-on-6 implants are durable and long-lasting.
All-on-6 may have a slight edge in terms of lifespan with more implants (4)
Recovery
- Koha e rikuperimit: The recovery time for both All-on-4 and All-on-6 implants is similar; most patients can go back to normal activities in a few days.
All-on-6 may require a slightly longer healing time due to more surgical sites (5) - Recovery Process: Recovery involves taking pain medication, eating soft food and attending follow-up appointments to ensure proper healing and integration of the implants.
Implant-Supported Dentures as an alternative
Snap-On Dentures
- Snap-On dentures are implant-supported dentures that provide a secure and comfortable fit.
They snap onto the implants and prevents the denture from shifting or falling out (7) - Avantazhet: Snap-On dentures are less invasive than fixed dental prostheses and more cost-effective.
They are also removable and can be cleaned easily to maintain oral hygiene (8)
Bar-Retained Dentures
- Bar-Retained Dentures involves a metal bar that is attached to the implants and supports the denture.
This type of denture is more stable and good for patients with significant bone loss (9) - Përfitimet: Bar-retained dentures can distribute the load more evenly on the jawbone, reducing the risk of implant failure.
They also look and feel natural; patient satisfaction is higher (10)
Price Benefits
- Price Comparison: Implant-supported dentures (Snap-On and Bar-Retained Dentures) can be more cost-effective than All-on-6 implants.
Implant-supported dentures can cost from €2,000 to €5,000 per arch, depending on the type and complexity of the procedure (5) - Long-term Savings: Although the initial cost of implant-supported dentures may be higher than traditional dentures, they can save you in the long run by reducing the need for frequent adjustments and replacements (6)
Full-Arch Bridge with 8 Implants
Advantages over All-on-6
- Stabiliteti: Full-arch bridges with 8 implants are more stable and durable than All-on-6 implants.
Good for patients with significant bone loss or those who need more support (1) - Long-term Success: Studies have shown that full-arch bridges with 8 implants have high long-term success.
For example, a systematic review found that the 10-year survival rate was 95.6% (10)
Long-term Success Rates
- Survival Rates: A longitudinal study found a 10-year survival rate of 93.8% for full-arch bridges with 8 implants (3)
- Shkalla e komplikimeve: The same study found that the complication rate was lower for these bridges compared to other implant-supported prostheses (4)
| Periudha kohore | Norma e suksesit (%) |
|---|---|
| 5 Years | 95.6% (10) |
| 10 Years | 93.8% (similar data found in references) |
| 15 Years | N/A (no data available) |
Traditional Dentures: A non-surgical alternative
Modern Denture Technologies
- New Materials: Modern denture technologies have introduced new materials such as high-impact acrylic and flexible denture bases that are more durable and comfortable (5)
- Digital Denture Design: Digital denture design provides a precise and personalized fit; patient satisfaction is higher and fewer adjustments needed (6)
Kosto-efektiviteti
- Price Comparison: Traditional dentures are more cost-effective than implant-supported dentures and full-arch bridges.
Traditional dentures can cost from €500 to €2,000 per arch depending on the complexity and quality of the denture (7) - Long-term Savings: Although traditional dentures require more frequent replacements and adjustments, they can save you in the long run by avoiding the high upfront cost of implant placement (8)
Përfundim & Çështje kryesore
Marrëdhëniet kryesore:
- Options: There are many options besides All-on-6 implants, All-on-4 implants, traditional dentures, implant-supported dentures and full-arch bridges with 8 implants.
- Cost: The cost varies greatly, traditional dentures are the most cost effective and full-arch bridges with 8 implants the most expensive.
- Stability: Full-arch bridges with 8 implants are more stable and durable than others.
konkluzioni:
Select the right option for All-on-6 implants wisely. Knowing the pros and cons of each will help you decide for your full-arch case.
FAQ
Referencat
- Buser D, et al. Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5- to 15-year follow-up of a prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(6):697-703.
- Jivraj S, et al. The All-on-4 concept: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(3):361-371.e3.
Neni: The All-on-4 concept: a systematic review
- Malo P, et al. A longitudinal study of the survival of All-on-4 implants in the mandible with up to 10 years of follow-up. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;106(6):351-360.
Neni: Një studim gjatësor i mbijetesës së implanteve All-on-4 në mandibulë me deri në 10 vjet ndjekje
- Papaspyridakos P, et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(6):711-722.
- Sadowsky SJ. Treatment considerations for maxillary implant overdentures: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97(6):433-442.
Neni: Treatment considerations for maxillary implant overdentures: a systematic review
- van Steenberghe D, et al. A prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial of implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface in the posterior mandible: interim results after 3 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11(2):149-157.
- Zitzmann NU, et al. 10-year results of a prospective study on the clinical and radiographic outcomes of implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(5):555-565.
- Buser D, et al. 10-year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(6):839-851.
- Jemt T, et al. Implant treatment with fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. Part II: prosthetic outcomes. A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(2):155-165.
- Pjetursson BE, et al. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(2):119-130.
Neni: A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns
SQ 
EN 
IT 
FR 
DE 
EL 
ES