All on 8 Dental Implants: Best Types & Materials Guide

All on 8 dental implants are a game changer for full arch restoration but choosing the right materials is key to long term success.

Find out which implant and prosthetic materials give you the best combination of durability, aesthetics and functionality for your smile makeover.

What are the best materials for All on 8 dental implants?

The best materials for All on 8 dental implants are titanium or zirconia for the implant and porcelain, acrylic or zirconia for the prosthetic bridge. Titanium implants with zirconia bridges are the ultimate combination of durability and aesthetics. This configuration with 8 implants per jaw gives you more stability, better force distribution and improved chewing function than traditional systems and often without bone grafting.

All on 8 Implant Materials

All on 8 dental implants use various materials for the implants and prosthetic bridges. Let’s take a look:

Implantet e Titanit

Titanium is the most used material for dental implants including All on 8 systems.

Titanium implants are known for their biocompatibility and osseointegration properties(1).

They have a 98% success rate over 10 years(2).

Titanium has a high strength to weight ratio making it perfect for full arch restorations.

The material is corrosion resistant and durable so the implants are long term stable.

Titanium implants can last for decades with proper care and maintenance.

Implantet me Zirkoni

Zirconia implants are becoming popular as a metal free alternative to titanium.

These are made from zirconium dioxide, a ceramic material with high biocompatibility.

Zirconia implants have shown osseointegration rates similar to titanium in some studies(3).

They give excellent aesthetic results especially in patients with thin gum tissue.

Zirconia implants are hypoallergenic so suitable for patients with metal sensitivity.

However long term clinical data on zirconia implants is limited compared to titanium.

Hybrid Materials and Combinations

Some All on 8 systems use hybrid materials or combinations to get the best of both worlds.

Titanium implants with zirconia abutments are a popular combination, strength and aesthetics.

Hybrid prosthetics may use titanium framework with acrylic or ceramic overlay for cost effectiveness.

Some manufacturers offer implants with special surface treatments to enhance osseointegration(4).

Nano surface treatments on titanium implants have shown better bone to implant contact in studies(5).

The material combination depends on individual patient needs and clinical considerations.

Materiali	Durability (Years)	Fracture Resistance	Survival Rate (10 Years)	Wear Resistance	Rezistenca ndaj korrozionit
Titanium	20+[1]	High (66 MPa m^1/2)[8]	96.4%[3]	High[1]	High[1]
Zirkoni	15+[1]	Lower (5-10 MPa m^1/2)[8]	87-100%[3]	High[6]	Very High[6]

All on 8 Material Comparison

When choosing materials for All on 8 dental implants several factors come into play. Let’s compare:

Qëndrueshmëri dhe jetëgjatësi

Titanium implants have shown excellent longevity, 20 year survival rate of 95.4%(6).

Zirconia implants, although newer, have shown promising results 5 year survival rate of 95%(5).

Titanium has higher fatigue strength so more resistant to long term occlusal forces.

Zirconia’s fracture toughness has improved but still lower than titanium(4).

Hybrid prosthetics with metal framework has better longevity than full ceramic options.

Prosthetic material lifespan varies: acrylic may need to be replaced every 5-7 years, zirconia 15+ years.

Konsiderata estetike

Zirconia implants give better aesthetics especially in patients with thin gingival biotypes.

Titanium implants can cause greyish hue in the gum tissue in some cases and affect smile aesthetics.

Ceramic prosthetics gives the most natural looking results, closest to natural teeth.

Acrylic prosthetics may not look as natural but easier to repair and modify.

Custom shaded zirconia bridges can match adjacent natural teeth almost perfectly.

Hybrid prosthetics allows gum coloured materials to hide the transition between prosthesis and gum.

Cost Benefit Analysis

Titanium implants are generally more cost effective since they have been in use for a long time and available.

Zirconia implants are more expensive, costs up to 20-30% higher than titanium(3).

Acrylic prosthetics is the most affordable but may need to be replaced more often.

Zirconia prosthetics has higher initial cost but better longevity and aesthetics.

Cost effectiveness depends on patient age, oral health and aesthetic demands.

In some cases the long term cost of cheaper materials may exceed the cost of premium materials due to replacement needs.

Prosthetic Material Options for All on 8

The prosthetic material chosen will affect the overall success and patient satisfaction of All on 8 dental implants. Let’s see the options:

Acrylic Prosthetics

Acrylic prosthetics is a budget friendly option for All on 8 restorations.

These prosthetics is lighter in weight so less stress on the underlying implants.

Acrylic materials is easier to modify and repair if needed.

Lower fracture resistance compared to ceramic options, 7% fracture rate over 5 years(1).

Acrylic prosthetics will wear out over time and affect bite and aesthetics.

Some patients reported better speech adaptation with acrylic prosthetics because it’s similar to dentures.

Porcelain Based Solutions

Porcelain fused to metal (PFM) bridges gives a balance between strength and aesthetics.

PFM prosthetics has high success rate, 96.4% survival after 5 years(1).

These restorations has better color stability than acrylic options.

Porcelain based prosthetics can mimic the translucency of natural teeth better.

The metal substructure in PFM bridges adds extra strength and durability.

But porcelain chipping is still a concern, 14.9% after 10 years(2).

Zirconia Bridges

Monolithic zirconia bridges is getting popular for its strength and aesthetics.

These prosthetics has high fracture resistance, some studies reported no fracture over 5 years(3).

Zirconia bridges has excellent biocompatibility and low plaque accumulation.

Better color matching capabilities especially for patients with high aesthetic demands.

The material is hard and can cause wear on opposing natural teeth.

Recent development has improved the translucency of zirconia, addressing the previous aesthetic limitation.

Firefly Generate this real and 3D photo of after dental implant treatment. 4889

Faktorët e përzgjedhjes së materialit

Choosing the right material for All on 8 dental implants involves several factors. Let’s see them:

Kërkesat për densitetin e kockave

Bone density will affect the choice of implant material and design.

Titanium implants requires minimum bone density of 850 Hounsfield units for optimal stability(4).

Zirconia implants may require higher bone density due to its one piece design, above 1000 Hounsfield units(5).

Patients with lower bone density may benefit from titanium implants with special surface treatment.

Some studies says that implants with rougher surface achieve better osseointegration in low density bone(6).

In cases of severe bone loss, additional procedure like bone grafting may be needed regardless of implant material.

Aesthetic Goals

The smile line visibility will affect the material selection for prosthetics.

High smile lines may benefit from zirconia or porcelain prosthetics for better gingival aesthetics.

Zirconia implants can reduce the risk of greyish discolouration in thin gingival biotypes by 30%(5).

Custom shaded prosthetics can match natural teeth with 90% colour accuracy(1).

Hybrid prosthetics with gum coloured portion can mask severe gum recession.

The translucency of modern zirconia prosthetics can be adjusted to match the adjacent natural teeth.

Konsideratat buxhetore

The price difference between materials can be huge and will affect the decision.

Titanium implants is 20-30% cheaper than zirconia(3).

Acrylic prosthetics is 40-50% cheaper than full ceramic initially.

But the longevity of the material should be factored in to long term budget planning.

Some clinics has tiered pricing based on material and aesthetic outcome.

Financing and dental tourism can make premium material more affordable to patients.

Faktori	rëndësi	Considerations for Titanium	Considerations for Zirconia
Dendësia e kockave	Lartë	Minimum 850 Hounsfield units	Typically above 1000 Hounsfield units
Aesthetic Goals	Moderate to High	May cause greyish hue in thin gums	Reduces greyish discoloration by up to 30%
Buxheti	Varies	20-30% less expensive than zirconia	Kosto më e lartë fillestare
Jetëgjatësia	Lartë	20-year survival rate of 95.4%	5-year survival rate of 95%
Biokompatibiliteti	Kritike	Excellent osseointegration	Hypoallergenic, suitable for metal sensitivities

Latest All on 8 Materials

The field of dental implantology is always evolving, new material and technology is emerging to improve All on 8. Let’s see some of the latest:

New Alloy

Titanium-zirconium alloy is showing better strength and osseointegration.

These alloy has up to 40% higher tensile strength than pure titanium(2).

Some studies reported faster osseointegration with Ti-Zr alloy, reducing healing time by 2 weeks(2).

New copper containing titanium alloy has antimicrobial properties, reducing infection risk.

Researchers are looking into shape memory alloy for implant that can adapt to bone changes over time.

Magnesium based biodegradable alloy is being researched for temporary implant.

Advanced Ceramic

High translucency zirconia material is bridging the gap between strength and aesthetics.

These new zirconia material has up to 50% higher translucency than traditional(3).

Nano ceramic material is being developed, promising better fracture toughness.

Some manufacturer is looking into zirconia-lithium silicate hybrid for better machinability.

Gradient shaded zirconia block can produce more natural looking prosthetics with colour transition.

3D printed ceramic implant is in early stage of development, can produce custom design.

Firefly Generate this real and 3D photo of after dental implant treatment. 16948

Surface Treatment Technology

Laser modified implant surface show up to 20% better bone to implant contact(4).

Hydrophilic surface treatment can reduce osseointegration time to as short as 3-4 weeks in some cases.

Nano structured titanium surface is showing better osteoblast adhesion and proliferation.

Bioactive glass coating on implant is showing promise for faster bone formation.

Some researcher is looking into antibiotic infused surface treatment to prevent early implant infection.

Plasma sprayed hydroxyapatite coating is getting better over time.

Përfundim & Çështje kryesore

All on 8 implant is more stable with different material.
Titanium is the gold standard for implant, zirconia is getting popular.
Prosthetic material range from affordable acrylic to high end zirconia.
Material selection depends on bone density, aesthetics and budget.
New technology is improving implant performance and patient outcome.

In conclusion, the material choice for All on 8 dental implant is key to long term success. As technology get better, patient and clinician has more option to customize treatment to individual need, for better functional and aesthetic outcome.

FAQ

Cili është shteti më i lirë në BE për këtë procedurë?

The cheapest country in the EU for All-on-8 is Albania, offering high-quality procedures at significantly 70% lower costs compared to other European countries.

Sa kushton trajtimi i përmendur në këtë artikull?

The average cost of All-on-8 dental implants in Western European countries ranges from €20,000 to €30,000 per arch. In the United States, prices can be even higher, typically between $25,000 and $35,000 per arch. These costs include the implants, prosthetics, and associated procedures.

How long does the All-on-8 procedure take?

The All-on-8 procedure typically takes 2-3 hours per arch. Most patients can have both arches treated in a single day. However, the entire process, including initial consultations, planning, and follow-up appointments, may span several months.

Are All-on-8 implants removable like dentures?

No, All-on-8 implants are not removable by patients. They are permanently fixed to the implants in your jaw. Only a dental professional can remove them for maintenance or replacement if necessary. This fixed nature provides a more natural feel and function compared to removable dentures.

Referencat

(1) Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Polyzos IP, et al. Timing of implant placement after tooth extraction: immediate, immediate-delayed or delayed implants? A Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010;3(3):189-205.

Neni: Ndërhyrjet për zëvendësimin e dhëmbëve që mungojnë: implantet dentare në foletë ekstraktuese të freskëta

(2) Elani HW, Starr JR, Da Silva JD, et al. Trends in Dental Implant Use in the U.S., 1999-2016, and Projections to 2026. J Dent Res. 2018;97(13):1424-1430.

Neni: Trends in Dental Implant Use in the U.S., 1999-2016

(3) Misch CE. Basic concepts and techniques of dental implants. Dent Today. 2015;34(3):98-101.

Neni: Basic concepts and techniques of dental implants

(4) Setzer FC, Kim S. Comparison of long-term survival of implants and endodontically treated teeth. J Dent Res. 2014;93(1):19-26.

Neni: Dental implants – are they better than natural teeth?

(5) Gaviria L, Salcido JP, Guda T, et al. Current trends in dental implants. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;40(2):50-60.

Neni: Implantet Dentare

(6) Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Platform switch and dental implants: A meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015;43(6):629-646.