Top 5 All-on-8 Alternatives: Full Arch Restoration Guide

All-on-8 dental implants are the most popular choice for full arch restoration, but many patients are worried about the high costs and long recovery time.

If you’re looking for a more affordable and faster solution, you’re probably wondering: What are the best alternatives to All-on-8 dental implants?

What are the best alternatives to All-on-8 dental implants?

Find top alternatives to All-on-8 dental implants for full arch restoration. Key options are All-on-4, All-on-6, Trefoil system, zygomatic implants, and traditional dentures. Each has its own benefits: lower costs (from €9,500 for All-on-4) and customised solutions. Success rates: 98.2% for All-on-4 lower arch and 98% for All-on-6 upper arch.

All-on-4 Dental Implants: A Popular Option

How All-on-4 differs from All-on-8

All-on-4 dental implants are a simplified version of All-on-8, with only 4 implants per arch instead of 8. This reduces surgical complexity and treatment time.

All-on-4 is ideal for patients with limited bone density as it uses tilted posterior implants to maximize contact with the existing bone (1).

All-on-8 requires more bone volume and may require bone grafting, which increases costs and recovery time (2).

And All-on-4 has similar success rates, 98.2% for lower arch over 5 years (3). So it’s a good option for patients looking for a less invasive but reliable solution.

All-on-4 benefits and limitations

Përfitimet:

• Lower costs: from €9,500 per arch in Europe (4).
• Faster treatment time: can be done in one day, including extractions and implants (5).
• Less invasive: Fewer implants, less trauma, and less recovery time.
• High success rates: Clinical studies show long-term success rates over 95% for upper and lower arch (6).

All-on-6 Implants: Stability and Cost

All-on-6 vs All-on-8

All-on-6 dental implants is a balanced full-arch solution, 6 implants per arch. This configuration provides more stability and distributes the load more evenly, reducing the risk of implant failure (3).

All-on-6 is ideal for patients with moderate to severe bone loss, a middle ground between All-on-4 and All-on-8 (4).

And All-on-6 has high success rates, 98% for upper arch over 5 years, so it’s a good option for patients looking for a long-lasting solution (3).

Suitable for

• Moderate to severe bone loss: patients with significant bone resorption but still have enough volume to support 6 implants.
• Heavy biting forces: Patients with heavy occlusal loads benefit from the extra support of All-on-6.
• Aesthetic concerns: Patients looking for a natural look and feel may prefer All-on-6 for the ability to support more complex prosthetics.

Konsiderata:

• Kostoja: All-on-6 is more expensive than All-on-4 but less than All-on-8, from €12,000 per arch in Europe.
• Surgical complexity: More surgery than All-on-4 may take longer to recover.

Trefoil System: Lower Jaw Solution

Trefoil system features

The Trefoil system is a lower jaw solution, a fixed full arch prosthesis on 3 implants. This configuration provides a unique balance of stability and minimalism, ideal for patients with severe bone loss in the mandible (6).

Features of the Trefoil system: prefabricated framework, simplifies surgery, and reduces treatment time. Immediate loading means patients can get their final prosthesis on the same day as surgery (6).

Trefoil vs All-on-8

• Surgical complexity: Trefoil requires less surgery than All-on-8, 3 implants only.
• Treatment time: Trefoil has faster treatment time and immediate loading.
• Cost efficiency: from €8,000 per arch in Europe, Trefoil is cheaper than All-on-8.
• Success rates: 95% success rate over 2 years, a full arch solution (6).

Trefoil is a good alternative to All-on-8 for the lower jaw. It has an innovative design, is cost-efficient, and requires less surgery.

Zygomatic Implants: For Severe Bone Loss

When to use Zygomatic implants

Zygomatic implants are for patients with severe bone loss in the upper jaw, especially in the posterior region.
For patients with not enough bone volume for conventional implants and looking for a fixed full arch prosthesis (5).

Points to consider for zygomatic implants: patient’s overall health, bone resorption, anatomical limitations.
A dental professional evaluation is necessary to determine if you are a candidate for this procedure.

Pros and cons vs All-on-8

Comparison:

• Bone: Zygomatic implants can be placed in areas with minimal bone, ideal for patients with severe bone loss.
• Surgical complexity: more surgery than All-on-8, requires specialized training.
• Success rates: 90.5% success rate over 10 years (5).
• Kostoja: Zygomatic implants are more expensive than All-on-8, from €15,000 per arch in Europe.

Zygomatic implants are an option for patients with extreme bone loss, a stable and long-lasting full-arch solution.

Traditional Dentures: Non-surgical option

Denture technology today

Traditional dentures have changed with dental technology.

Modern dentures are more comfortable, durable, and aesthetic.

Digital impressions and 3D printing have improved the fit and accuracy of dentures and patient satisfaction (1).

And implant-supported dentures have given patients a more stable and secure option.

These dentures are attached to the jawbone with dental implants for better chewing function and less denture movement (2).

Cost vs All-on-8 and other implants

Kostoja:

• Traditional Dentures: from €1,500 per arch in Europe, cheaper than All-on-8 and other implant-supported options.
• Implant-supported dentures: from €5,000 per arch, midrange between traditional dentures and full arch implant restorations like All-on-8.
• Long-term cost: traditional dentures need more replacements and adjustments; implant-supported dentures can be more cost-effective in the long run due to their durability and stability.

Which All-on-8 alternative?

What to consider

When choosing an All-on-8 alternative, you need to consider:

• Bone density and quality: the amount and quality of bone in the jaw will determine the implant system (4).
• Patient health and medical history: some health conditions and medications can affect dental implant success (1).
• Aesthetic and functional needs: patient’s expectations for the appearance and function of the restoration (2).
• Budget and cost: the cost of the treatment is a key factor as different options have different prices (3).

Consultation with a dental professional

A dental professional consultation is necessary to determine which All-on-8 alternative is best for you. During the consultation, the dentist will:

• Examine your oral health: check the teeth, gums, and jawbone to identify any problems.
• Explain treatment options: explain the different options, advantages, and disadvantages to help you decide.
• Customised treatment plan: tailor the treatment to your needs and wants.

By considering these and consulting with a dental professional, you can make an informed decision about the best All-on-8 alternative for your full arch restoration.

Përfundim & Çështje kryesore

Pikat kryesore:

• All-on-4 and All-on-6 are high success rate options for moderate bone loss.
• Trefoil is a unique option for lower jaw restoration with immediate loading.
• Zygomatic implants for severe upper jaw bone loss.
• Traditional dentures are still a cheap option with modern denture technology.

konkluzioni:

Choosing the right All-on-8 alternative requires individual needs, bone density and budget. By knowing the advantages and disadvantages of each option you can make an informed decision for your full arch restoration. Consult a dental professional to determine which one is best for you and get a customised treatment plan.

FAQ