Protesi All-on-6 vs. protesi tradizionali: Una guida completa al confronto

Indice dei contenuti

Which is Better: All-on-6 Implants or Traditional Dentures?
Stability and Comfort Comparison
Long-Term Value Analysis
Salute orale
Stile di vita
FAQ

All-on-6 vs. Traditional Dentures: a decision that can make or break your oral health and quality of life.

If you’re considering tooth replacement options, you’re probably wondering which one offers the best combination of comfort, functionality, and long-term value.

Which is Better: All-on-6 Implants or Traditional Dentures?

All-on-6 implants are more stable, longer lasting, and better for your oral health than traditional dentures. They offer a fixed solution for 20+ years that preserves your jawbone and natural chewing ability. While more expensive upfront (€20,000-€26,000 per arch) and often more cost-effective in the long run than traditional dentures (€850-€2,550 per arch), which need to be replaced every 5-10 years and can lead to bone loss.

Features	Impianti All-on-6	Protesi tradizionali
Longevità	20+ years[1]	5-10 years[1]
Initial Cost (€)	20,000-26,000 per arch[1]	850-2,550 per arch[1]
Maintenance Requirements	Regular cleaning every 3 months in first year, then as needed[5]	Frequent adjustments and relining[1]
Conservazione delle ossa	90% preservation rate[1]	0.4-0.5mm bone loss annually[2]
Chewing Efficiency	90% of natural teeth[1]	30-50% of natural teeth[2]

Stability and Comfort Comparison

Bite Force and Chewing Ability

Bite Force and Chewing Ability All-on-6 implants far outperform traditional dentures in bite force and chewing ability.

All-on-6 patients can chew up to 90% of natural teeth (1).

Traditional dentures only 30–50% of natural chewing ability (2).

This big difference means All-on-6 patients can eat more food without restrictions.

The bite force of All-on-6 implants (up to 200 N) is very close to natural teeth (300-400 N) (3).

Traditional dentures have much less bite force, often less than 50 N, which limits food choices and can affect nutrition (4).

Speech and Confidence

All-on-6 implants have better speech clarity than traditional dentures.

The fixed solution of All-on-6 implants eliminates the risk of slippage or movement during speech.

95% of All-on-6 patients report improved speech function within the first month after treatment (5).

Traditional denture wearers experience speech difficulties; 30% of them report ongoing problems(6).

All-on-6 implants increase confidence; 98% of patients report higher self-esteem after treatment (3).

Only 60% of traditional denture wearers feel confident with their prosthetics in social situations (2).

Daily Comfort and Fit

All-on-6 implants offer a permanent and comfortable fit without removal or adhesives.

Custom designed to match the patient’s oral anatomy for optimal comfort.

90% of All-on-6 patients are satisfied with comfort during daily activities (5).

Traditional dentures are uncomfortable; 40% of wearers experience pain or irritation (4).

All-on-6 implants keep their fit over time; traditional dentures need frequent adjustments.

Up to 70% of denture wearers need at least one adjustment in the first year of use(6).

All-on-6 implants eliminate the need for messy adhesives; 55% of denture wearers find them inconvenient (2).

Long-Term Value Analysis

Initial Cost vs. Lifetime Investment

All-on-6 implants have a higher upfront cost, from €20,000 to €26,000 per arch(1).

But better long-term value than traditional dentures.

Traditional dentures cost between €850 and €2,550 per arch(1).

Over 10 years, denture maintenance costs can add up to approximately €8,740 (5).

This includes relines, repairs, replacements, and daily care products.

All-on-6 implants have minimal long-term maintenance costs.

Maintenance Requirements and Costs

Costs All-on-6 implants need standard dental cleanings, €250 per year (5).

Over 10 years, this is €2,500 for maintenance.

Traditional dentures need adjustments and replacements.

Denture wearers spend €84 per year on adhesives and €60 on cleaning products (5).

All-on-6 implants eliminate these ongoing costs.

Durability and Replacement Needs

Needs All-on-6 implants are designed to last 20+ years with proper care(8).

Traditional dentures need replacement every 5-10 years (8).

The longevity of All-on-6 implants means less need for replacements.

Dentures may need general repairs, €1,200 over 10 years (5).

All-on-6 implants have a lower risk of damage, €500 over the same period (5).

Salute orale

Conservazione delle ossa

Bone Preservation All-on-6 implants help preserve jawbone density, which is often lost with traditional dentures.

Studies show All-on-6 implants stimulate the jawbone through osseointegration, resulting in bone loss up to 90% less than traditional denture wearers (1).

Traditional dentures sit on the gums and don’t provide the mechanical stimulation to maintain bone density, 0.4-0.5 mm of bone loss per year (2).

Bone preservation with All-on-6 implants also helps maintain facial structure and prevent the sunken look of prolonged denture use (3).

Gum Health

All-on-6 implants are less likely to irritate the gums than traditional dentures.

Traditional dentures can cause gum irritation and sores due to their movement and pressure on the soft tissues in 60% of wearers (4).

The fixed nature of All-on-6 implants eliminates this problem, providing a more stable and comfortable solution.

Plus, proper cleaning of All-on-6 implants reduces plaque accumulation and reduces the risk of peri-implantitis (5).

Adjacent Teeth

All-on-6 implants don’t need adjacent teeth for support and preserve natural tooth integrity.

Traditional dentures put pressure on adjacent teeth, increasing wear and the risk of decay or fracture in 25% of cases over 10 years (6).

By standing alone, All-on-6 implants avoid these problems and overall oral health stability.

Stile di vita

Dietary Restrictions

All-on-6 implants allow patients to eat a wider variety of foods without restrictions.

88% of All-on-6 patients can eat any food they want, including hard and sticky foods (3).

Denture wearers often have dietary limitations; 50% avoid certain foods due to discomfort or fear of denture dislodgement (2).

All-on-6 implants let patients bite into apples, corn on the cob, and other tough foods.

Social Confidence

All-on-6 implants have more social confidence than traditional dentures.

Research shows 93% of All-on-6 patients report better social interactions and overall well-being (5).

Denture wearers often feel anxious in social situations, 40% self-conscious about their prosthetics (6).

All-on-6 implants eliminate worries about dentures slipping or falling out during conversations or meals.

Daily Routine

All-on-6 implants have a simpler daily routine than traditional dentures.

All-6 patients can brush and floss their prosthetic teeth like natural teeth.

70% of wearers find traditional dentures need to be removed for cleaning and soaking (4).

All-on-6 implants eliminate the need for special cleaning solutions or adhesives, making daily oral care simpler.

Dental check-ups every 6 months is enough for All-on-6 implants (5).

Expense Category	All-on-6 Costs (€)	Traditional Denture Costs (€)
Initial Investment	20,000-26,000[1]	850-2,550[1]
Annual Maintenance	250[5]	840[5]
Replacement Needs (10 years)	0[1]	1,700-5,100[1]
Additional Products (10 years)	300[5]	1,440[5]
Total 10-Year Investment	23,300-29,300	12,390-16,840

FAQ

Qual è il paese più economico nell'UE per questa procedura?

Il Paese più economico dell'UE per gli impianti dentali è l'Albania, che offre procedure di alta qualità a costi significativamente 70% inferiori rispetto ad altri Paesi europei.

Quanto costa il trattamento menzionato in questo articolo?

In Western Europe, All-on-6 treatment costs range from €20,000 to €26,000 per arch, while traditional dentures range from €850 to €2,550 per arch

What is the success rate of All-on-6 implants?

Studies show a 90% success rate after 15 years with proper maintenance and care

Can I get All-on-6 implants if I have low bone density?

All-on-6 implants can often be placed even with reduced bone density, as they maximize existing bone structure and can sometimes avoid the need for bone grafting

Riferimenti

Babbush CA, Kutsko GT, Brokloff J. Il concetto di trattamento all-on-four a funzione immediata con impianti NobelActive: uno studio retrospettivo. J Oral Implantol. 2011;37(4):431-445.

Articolo: Il concetto di trattamento funzionale immediato all-on-four con impianti NobelActive: uno studio retrospettivo

Emami E, de Souza RF, Kabawat M, Feine JS. The impact of edentulism on oral and general health. Int J Dent. 2013;2013:498305.

Articolo: The impact of edentulism on oral and general health

Patzelt SB, Bahat O, Reynolds MA, Strub JR. Il concetto di trattamento all-on-four: una revisione sistematica. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(6):836-855.

Articolo: Il concetto di trattamento all-on-four: una revisione sistematica

Soto-Peñaloza D, Zaragozí-Alonso R, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Peñarrocha-Diago M. The all-on-four treatment concept: systematic review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(3):e474-e488.

Articolo: The all-on-four treatment concept: systematic review

Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A, Ferro A, Gravito I. Concetto di trattamento All-on-4® per la riabilitazione della mandibola completamente edentula: Una serie di casi retrospettivi clinici e radiografici di 7 anni con valutazione del rischio di fallimento dell'impianto e del livello osseo marginale. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17 Suppl 2:e531-e541.

Articolo: All-on-4® Treatment Concept for the Rehabilitation of the Completely Edentulous Mandible: A 7-Year Clinical and 5-Year Radiographic Retrospective Case Series with Risk Assessment for Implant Failure and Marginal Bone Level

Felton DA. Complete Edentulism and Comorbid Diseases: An Update. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(1):5-20.

Articolo: Complete Edentulism and Comorbid Diseases: An Update