Acrylic All-on-4 dental implants are a popular solution for a full smile restoration, but many are left wondering, “What are they and how do they compare to other dental implant options?”
If you’re one of those looking for a reliable, cost-effective, and efficient way to get your confidence and oral functionality back, you’re in the right place.
What are Acrylic All-on-4 Implants?
Acrylic All-on-4 dental implants are a type of dental implant solution that uses 4 implants to support a full arch of acrylic teeth.
Ventajas clave:
High Success Rates: 98.7% at 3 years and 98.2% at 5 years (1)
Immediate Functionality: Acrylic All-on-4 implants provide immediate restoration and functionality.
Cost-effective: reduces overall treatment costs by eliminating bone grafting.
Benefits of Acrylic All-on-4 Implants
Immediate Restoration and Functionality
Funcionalidad inmediata: Acrylic All-on-4 implants material offer immediate restoration and functionality, patient satisfaction, and quality of life.
98.7% at 3 years and 98.2% at 5 years (1)
Satisfacción de los pacientes: Immediate restoration and functionality of acrylic All-on-4 implants increase patient satisfaction.
This is due to rapid recovery of oral function and aesthetic appeal, which boosts confidence and overall well-being.
Cost-Effective and Simple
Rentable: Acrylic All-on-4 implants are more cost-effective than traditional implant methods.
By using fewer implants and no bone grafting, overall treatment costs are reduced.
This makes it more accessible to patients looking for a full smile restoration.
Simple: The All-on-4 treatment concept is simple; 4 implants in strategic positions make the surgery simple and reduce the complexity of the procedure.
This simplicity makes it cost-effective and efficient.
Patient Satisfaction
Durabilidad a largo plazo: Acrylic All-on-4 implants have shown long-term durability; studies have shown high survival rates over time.
For example, a 7-year clinical and 5-year radiographic retrospective case series showed high success rates (1).
Quality of Life: Immediate restoration and functionality of Acrylic All-on-4 implants improve patient quality of life.
By restoring a full smile and oral function, patients feel more confident and overall well-being.
| Beneficio | Descripción |
|---|---|
| Immediate Restoration and Functionality | Offers immediate restoration and functionality, enhancing patient satisfaction and quality of life. |
| Relación coste-eficacia | Reduces overall treatment costs by eliminating the need for bone grafting and using fewer implants. |
| Altas tasas de éxito | Studies show cumulative survival rates of 98.7% at 3 years and 98.2% at 5 years. |
| Enhanced Patient Satisfaction | Rapid recovery of oral function and aesthetic appeal boosts confidence and overall well-being. |
| Durabilidad a largo plazo | Demonstrated high survival rates over extended periods in clinical studies. |
All-on-4 | Top 3 Materials & Which is Best
Acrylic vs. Ceramic vs. Metal-Ceramic: A Comparison
Material: Acrylic implants, ceramic, and metal-ceramic are the top 3 materials used in All-on-4 implants.
Each has its own properties and benefits. Acrylic is cost-effective and easy to fabricate; ceramic is aesthetic and durable (4).
Clinical Outcomes: Studies have shown that acrylic superstructures have similar clinical outcomes to ceramic superstructures in terms of survival rates and patient satisfaction.
A 6-year clinical outcome study found no significant difference in implant survival rates between acrylic and ceramic superstructures (4).
Material Selection Criteria for Best Results
Material Selection: Material selection for All-on-4 implants is key to best results.
Patient preference, aesthetic requirements, and budget constraints should be considered.
A review article on the All-On-Four treatment concept stressed the importance of material selection for high success rates and patient satisfaction (3).
Personalización: Customization of the material and design of the superstructure is critical for best results.
A new approach using narrow platform NobelActive implants showed the importance of customization for better patient outcomes (5).
Clinical Considerations for Acrylic All-on-4 implants
Marginal Bone Loss and Complications
Marginal Bone Loss: Marginal bone loss is a key consideration for long-term success of Acrylic All-on-4 implants.
A 7-year clinical and 5-year radiographic retrospective case series showed that the mean marginal bone loss was 1.3 mm at 5 years, so bone level was stable over time (1).
Complication Rates: Complication rates for Acrylic All-on-4 implants are low.
However, a prospective report on medium- and long-term outcomes found that most complications were related to prosthetic issues rather than implant failure, so proper prosthetic protocols are important (2).
Prosthetic Protocols and Immediate Loading
Prosthetic Protocols: Prosthetic protocols used in acrylic All-on-4 implants are key to the treatment.
A review article on the All-On-Four treatment concept stressed the importance of proper prosthetic design and immediate loading for high success rates and patient satisfaction (3).
Carga inmediata: Immediate loading of acrylic All-on-4 implants is critical for immediate restoration and function.
A 6-year clinical outcome study on implant placement supported acrylic vs. ceramic superstructures found that immediate loading did not affect the survival rates of the implants (4).
Risk Factors and Predictive Indicators
Risk Factors: Knowing the risk factors and predictive indicators is key to acrylic All-on-4 implants.
A new approach using narrow platform NobelActive implants showed that implant positioning and patient selection are critical for best results (5).
Predictive Indicators: Predictive indicators such as bone density and patient health status are important to determine if Acrylic All-on-4 implants are suitable for individual patients.
A review article on the All-On-Four treatment concept stressed the importance of thorough patient evaluation for best outcomes (3).
Conclusiones
Principales conclusiones:
High Success Rates: Acrylic All-on-4 implants have the best results, 98.7% at 3 years and 98.2% at 5 years (1).
Funcionalidad inmediata: Acrylic All-on-4 implants give immediate restoration and function, patient satisfaction, and quality of life.
Cost-effective: This reduces overall treatment cost by no bone grafting and fewer implants.
Conclusión:
Acrylic All-on-4 implants is a reliable, cost-effective and efficient solution for full smile restoration. With best results, immediate function and cost-effectiveness, this is a good option for patients to regain their confidence and oral function.
PREGUNTAS FRECUENTES
Referencias
Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A, Ferro A, Gravito I. Concepto de tratamiento All-4 para la rehabilitación de la mandíbula completamente desdentada: Una serie de casos retrospectiva clínica y radiográfica de 7 y 5 años con evaluación del riesgo de fracaso del implante y del nivel de hueso marginal. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17 Suppl 2:e531-41. doi: 10.1111/cid.12282. Epub 2014 dic 23. PMID: 25536438.
- Lopes A, Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Sanchez-Fernández E. The NobelGuide All-on-4 treatment concept for rehabilitation of edentulous jaws: A prospective report on medium- and long-term outcomes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17 Suppl 2:e406-16. doi: 10.1111/cid.12260. Epub 2014 Sep 5. PMID: 25195544.
- Soyfer V. Review Article on the All-On-Four Treatment Concept in Dental Implants. Arch Surg Clin Res. 2023;7:019-023. doi: 10.29328/journal.ascr.1001070.
Artículo: Artículo de revisión sobre el concepto de tratamiento All-On-Four en implantes dentales
- Tyrovolas S, Koyanagi A, Panagiotakos DB, Haro JM. Six-year clinical outcomes of implant-supported acrylic vs. ceramic superstructures according to the All-on-4 treatment concept for the rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla. J Clin Periodontol. 2021;48:836-855. doi: 10.1007/s10266-021-00605-4.
- Babbush CA, Kanawati A, Brokloff J. A new approach to the All-on-Four treatment concept using narrow platform NobelActive implants. J Oral Implantol. 2013;39(3):314-25. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00223. Epub 2013 Feb 11. PMID: 23397976.
ES 
EN 
IT 
FR 
DE 
EL 
SQ