Implantes dentales All-on-8

All-on-8 dental implants are the ultimate solution for full-mouth restoration, but are they for you?

Find out how this advanced technique can transform your smile and oral health as we break down the All-on-8 implants.

What are All-on-8 dental implants?

All-on-8 dental implants are a full-arch restoration technique using 8 implants per jaw to support a fixed prosthesis. This method has more stability and force distribution than All-on-4 or All-on-6. Studies show high success rates, costing from €8,000 to €15,000 per arch. Less bone grafting and immediate function.

All-on-8 | Step-by-Step Procedure & Timeline

The All-on-8 dental implant procedure involves:

1. Initial Consultation and Planning

• Full oral examination and 3D scans
• Personalised treatment plan

2. Preparatory Procedures (if needed)

• Tooth extractions or bone grafting

3. Implant Surgery

• 8 implants per jaw under local anaesthesia
• 2-3 hours per arch
• Immediate loading of temporary prosthesis possible

4. Cicatrización y osteointegración

• 3-6 months healing time
• Revisiones periódicas

5. Final Prosthesis Fitting

• Custom-made permanent bridge
• Adjustments for comfort and function

6. Follow-up and Maintenance

• Regular check-ups and oral hygiene

Timeline

• Total duration: 4-7 months
• Success rate up to 98% after 10 years with proper care3

All-on-8 is a quick transformation, many patients see improvement in quality of life in a few months of treatment.

All on 8 | Best Types & Materials

Materials

1. Titanio

• High biocompatibility
• Alta resistencia y durabilidad
• Up to 98% success rate after 10 years

2. Zirconia

• Metal free with great aesthetics
• Same strength as titanium
• New material, growing popularity

Prosthesis

1. Porcelana

• Natural look and durability
• For visible areas

2. Zirconia

• Highly durable when well made
• Superior aesthetics, like natural teeth

4. Acrílico

• More affordable
• Easier to adjust and repair

Consider

• Oral health and bone structure
• Estética
• Presupuesto
• Long term maintenance

See an experienced implant dentist to find the best combination of materials for your case. All-on-8 implants offer great stability and force distribution from €40,000 per arch but can improve quality of life and long term oral health.

All-on-8 pros and cons

Pros of All-on-8 Implants

More stability and support:

• 8 implants more force distribution
• Especially good for those with big bone loss

More functionality:

• Better chewing and speaking
• Eat all foods without worry

Natural aesthetics:

• Looks and feels like natural teeth
• Instant improvement and confidence boost

Long term oral health benefits:

• Prevents bone deterioration
• Maintains facial structure and shape

Quick treatment:

• 4 appointments over 1-2 weeks
• No bone grafting often required

Cons of All-on-8 Implants

More expensive:

• More than All-on-4 or All-on-6 due to 2 extra implants

Longer surgery:

• More time than fewer implant options

Requires more bone density:

• Not suitable for all patients, especially those with big bone loss

Who can get all-on-8?

All-on-8 dental implants are suitable for people missing most or all teeth in the upper or lower arch.

Ideal candidates have enough bone density in the jaw, good overall oral health, and are nonsmokers.

However, conditions like uncontrolled medical conditions, severe gum disease, or recent cancer treatments may exclude you.

A consultation with an experienced implant dentist is essential to determine if you are suitable for this full-arch solution.

Do I need bone grafting for All-on-8 dental implants?

Bone grafting with All-on-8 dental implants depends on your individual bone density and quality.

While All-on-8 implants are placed to make use of the existing bone, some patients may still need bone augmentation to ensure the implants integrate well.

A 3D dental scan will determine if grafting is needed; factors like tooth loss duration, gum disease history, and overall oral health will play a role in this assessment.

Your implant dentist will assess these during the first consultation to create a personal treatment plan.

All-on-8 alternatives

All-on-8 is a great solution for full arch restoration but not for everyone. Here are alternatives:

All-on-4 and All-on-6 implants

These options use fewer implants per arch:

• All-on-4 uses 4 implants in the jaw
• All-on-6 uses 6 implants for extra support

Both can provide full arch restoration with lower cost and shorter treatment time than All-on-8.

Implant-supported overdentures

This combines the stability of implants with the convenience of removable dentures:

• More stable than traditional dentures
• No denture adhesive needed
• Better chewing function
• Better facial structure support

Implant-supported fixed bridges

A customized solution that offers:

• Natural feel and look
• Healthy jawbone and facial structure maintenance
• May need fewer implants than All-on-8

Traditional dentures

For those who want a more affordable option:

• Cost effective
• Non invasive
• Suitable for those with not enough bone density for implants

Snap-on dentures

A hybrid solution that combines traditional dentures and implants:

• Uses as few as 2 implants per arch
• More stable than traditional dentures
• Removable for easy cleaning

Conclusiones

Principales conclusiones:

• All-on-8 dental implants are more stable than options with fewer implants.
• 3-6 months of healing and osseointegration.
• All-on-8 implants can improve chewing function, speech and overall well being.
• Maintenance and regular check ups are key to long term success.

PREGUNTAS FRECUENTES

Referencias

1. Buser D, et al. Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5- to 15-year follow-up of a prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(6):697-705.
   Artículo: Estabilidad a largo plazo de implantes osteointegrados en hueso aumentado: seguimiento de 5 a 15 años de un estudio prospectivo
2. Jokstad A, et al. Quality of dental implants. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16(2):172-176.
   Artículo: Quality of dental implants
3. Pjetursson BE, et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(6):667-676.
   Artículo: A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years
4. Lindh T, et al. A meta-analysis of implants in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(2):147-155.
   Artículo: A meta-analysis of implants in partially edentulous patients
5. Tonetti MS, et al. Periodontal regeneration of human intrabony defects. I. Clinical measures. J Periodontol. 1998;69(2):197-206.
   Artículo: Periodontal regeneration of human intrabony defects. I. Clinical measures
6. Esposito M, et al. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(4):CD003815.
   Artículo: Intervenciones para sustituir dientes ausentes: diferentes tipos de implantes dentales