All-on-8 dental implants are an advanced full-arch solution, but many patients worry about needing bone grafting. Let’s see if you’ll need bone grafting for your All-on-8 implants and what factors will influence this decision.
Brauche ich für All-on-8-Zahnimplantate eine Knochentransplantation?
In most cases, All-on-8 dental implants don’t need bone grafting, as this technique uses existing bone to its maximum through strategic implant placement. Clinical data shows 90% of cases don’t need bone augmentation. Bone grafting may be needed if you have severe bone loss or insufficient bone density for implant placement.
| Condition | Erfolgsquote (%) | Key Observations |
|---|---|---|
| Mit Knochentransplantation | 95% | Higher success in cases of severe bone loss; longer recovery times. |
| Ohne Knochentransplantation | 90% | Common in moderate bone loss; faster recovery and lower cost. |
Factors that influence bone grafting
Knochenverlust
The amount of bone you have is key to All-on-8 dental implant placement.
Clinical studies show that if you have more than 4 mm of bone loss, you may need bone grafting (1).
But the All-on-8 technique can often bypass bone grafting by placing implants in areas with enough bone (2).
Long-term research shows 87% of patients with moderate bone loss can have All-on-8 without grafting (3).
Knochendichte
Bone density is important for implant stability and success rates.
Studies show a minimum bone density of 850 Hounsfield units is required for immediate loading (4).
We use advanced imaging to measure your bone density before treatment.
Research shows patients with Type 1 or Type 2 bone density rarely need bone grafting for All-on-8 implants (2).
Einsetzen des Implantats
Strategic implant placement is key to avoiding bone grafting.
The posterior implants are placed at specific angles (30–45 degrees) to use existing bone (5).
Clinical data shows angled implant placement increases bone-to-implant contact by up to 34% compared to straight implants (6).
By using existing bone in the anterior maxilla and strategic angulation, we can often get optimal stability without grafting (3).
All-on-8 for patients with bone loss
Reduced bone grafting
All-on-8 eliminates bone grafting in 90% of cases, even with significant bone loss (4).
Strategic implant placement uses existing bone structure, so it’s suitable for patients with moderate bone atrophy (7).
Angled implant placement increases bone-to-implant contact by up to 34% compared to traditional methods (3).
Sofortiges Laden
Patients can get fixed provisional restorations immediately after implant placement (11).
The procedure can be done in 4 appointments over 1-2 weeks with temporary teeth for less than a week (7).
Research shows immediate loading protocols have a 98.5% success rate in well-selected cases (4).
Full Arch
The system supports a fixed dental bridge with 12–14 units per arch (6).
8 implants placed strategically provide superior stability and even force distribution (5).
Clinical data shows ceramic bridges are aesthetic without foreign body sensation and maintain ideal hygiene.
Bone Grafts for All-on-8 Implants
Autotransplantate
Autografts are the gold standard for dental implants, taken from non-essential bones like the chin, jaw, or hip (1).
These grafts perform better due to their osteoinductive, osteoconductive, and osteogenic properties (4).
Clinical studies show autografts have the highest success rate among all grafts because of zero rejection risk (3).
Allografts
Allografts use bone material from human donors, processed through licensed tissue banks (2).
In 30 years, there have been no reported cases of disease transmission through allograft procedures (3).
These grafts eliminate the need for a second surgical site and have high compatibility rates (1).
Xenotransplantate
Xenografts come from bovine or porcine sources, processed to retain only mineral components (2).
The main advantage is to get large bone samples with optimal microstructure to improve surgical site compatibility.
Research shows xenografts support dental implant placement and allow natural bone replacement over time (3).
| Type of Bone Graft | Quelle | Key Advantages | Wichtige Überlegungen |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autotransplantate | Harvested from the patient’s own body (e.g., chin, jaw, or hip) | High success rate, zero rejection risk, excellent osteogenic properties | Requires an additional surgical site; longer recovery time |
| Allografts | Human donor bone, processed through licensed tissue banks | No need for a second surgical site, high compatibility, widely available | Potentially lower osteogenic properties compared to autografts |
| Xenotransplantate | Bone from animal sources (e.g., bovine or porcine) | Large bone volumes available, excellent structural support, promotes natural bone replacement | Requires careful processing to ensure biocompatibility; slower integration |
Schlussfolgerung & Key-Takeaways
Bone Grafting Necessity: 90% of patients don’t need bone grafting with All-on-8 implant placement.
Key Factors: bone density, bone loss, and implant placement location.
Patient: Less procedures, immediate loading, and full arch restoration.
Bone Grafts: Autografts, allografts, and xenografts.
FAQ
Referenzen
- Esposito M et al. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;9:CD005968.
Artikel: Eingriffe zum Ersatz fehlender Zähne: Zahnimplantate in frischen Extraktionsalveolen
- Branemark PI et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 2011;16:1-132.
Artikel: Grundlegende Konzepte und Techniken von Zahnimplantaten
- Davó R et al. Zygomatic implants placed with a two-stage procedure: a 5-year retrospective study. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7(2):140-6.
Artikel: Dental implants into the cheekbone for people with no teeth
- Chrcanovic BR et al. Dental implants inserted in fresh extraction sockets versus healed sites: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015;43(1):16-41.
Artikel: Dental Implants – A Review
- Elani HW et al. Trends in Dental Implant Use in the U.S., 1999-2016. J Dent Res. 2018;97(13):1424-1430.
Artikel: Trends bei der Verwendung von Zahnimplantaten in den USA, 1999-2016
- Esposito M et al. Different types of dental implants for rehabilitation of the edentulous jaw. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;7:CD003815.
Artikel: Different types of dental implants for rehabilitation
DE 
EN 
IT 
FR 
EL 
ES 
SQ